ZYB slag pump is not inferior to any developed countries in

China's industrialization is actually the gathering process of manufacturing industry, processing and assembly are the main forms of manufacturing industry.

This kind of industrialization basically does not need the support of new technology, but only needs the support of traditional technology transfer.

As a result, it is now common to think of China as a global manufacturing center, but no one thinks of China as the center of the industrial revolution of the new century.

According to Professor Jeremy Rifkin's book, The Third Industrial Revolution, the new industrial revolution should be the energy revolution, which is about how to bring together decentralized new energy sources through breakthrough transmission technologies.

The lack of innovation capacity is the biggest problem in China's society at present, so is the technological innovation of Chinese enterprises.

As far as enterprises are concerned, I personally think the biggest obstacle to innovation capability is the system and mechanism, which are mainly reflected in the following aspects:

 

So I'm not entirely convinced by Coase's claim that China is' a little behind 'in ZYB slag pump technology innovation.

This is a face-saving assessment of China. In fact, it is not "a little behind", but "a big gap".

 

First, the GDP doctrine of quick success and instant benefits has eroded the "soil" of technological innovation.

Innovation needs to be "slow and steady" and may not yield results in three to five years or even longer. The performance orientation of GDP requires immediate growth, while the technical content of GDP is not included in the assessment.

The most expensive and most valuable company in China is Kweichow Moutai, while the most expensive and most valuable company in the United States (probably not anymore) is Apple. The former is a no-tech brewer, and the latter is a classic high-tech company.

This is the difference between China's GDP and US GDP.

 

Second, China's private enterprises generally lack the strength of technological innovation.

From the perspective of system and other aspects, private enterprises are naturally more enthusiastic about innovation than state-owned enterprises, and they should be the main force of technological innovation in China.

But China's financial system favors large companies, and private companies, because of their small size, face widespread discrimination in access to financial services.

It is precisely because of China's imperfect financial system that private enterprises in China have difficulty in financing, and most of them are concentrated in low-end industries, with fierce competition and generally poor profitability, so they cannot invest heavily in research and development. However, modern technological innovation is about strength.

 

Third, the "official standard" social value system inhibits the spirit of innovation.

Although we advocate respect for knowledge and talents, in fact, for thousands of years the Chinese people have cherished the idea of being an official in their bones.

The phenomenon is best illustrated by China's cramped national civil service exams.

When a senior professor of a university ranks below the lowest administrative level of the university, the country has lost its ability to innovate.

In China, the highest reward for outstanding researchers is promotion to the ranks of officials, so that all the best people in China are attracted to the ranks of officials, leaving only second-rate people to do research and innovation.

 

Fourth, China has not yet developed a complete intellectual property protection system, which affects the enthusiasm of enterprises for innovation.

Technological innovation requires a large investment. If the innovation resulting from a large investment is easily imitated, the investment of the inventor cannot be compensated and rewarded in a timely manner.

The prevalence of Chinese manufacturing imitation, "copycat" into harm, counterfeiting is related to this.

On the issue of IPR protection, China has also been criticized in the international community. However, it should be noted that China's IPR protection system is in the process of improving.

 

Xu Hua said.

First of all, I think China has never happened in the industrial revolution, because, it is to be called "revolution" has influence world of disruptive technology innovation, such as the 18th century British industrial revolution is the invention of the steam engine, the mechanization of the 19th century America's industrial revolution is the invention of the electric power technology, the electrification of

The industrial revolution in Japan in the 20th century was the informationization brought by microelectronic technology.

On the contrary, despite the vigorous industrialization in the middle and late stage, China's industrialization process has not been accompanied by breakthrough technological innovation, but has brought extreme consumption of resources and great damage to the environment.